Abortion Supporters Are ‘Anti-Science,’ Ken Ham Says
Answers in Genesis founder Ken Ham says he’s often accused of being “anti-science” for rejecting evolution.
But in a new blog post, he says it’s the other side – specifically, pro-choicers – that often are the ones opposing science.
“Do you know who is often anti-science? Those who support abortion,” he wrote on his blog Thursday.
Ham referenced a CNN debate involving political analyst Christine Quinn, a former Democratic politician and a board member of the National Institute for Reproductive Health.
“When a woman gets pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her,” Quinn said. “It’s part of her body.”
Quinn is rejecting basic science and biology, Ham said.
“What is it — a dog, a dolphin, a green bean?” he asked. “It has 100 percent human DNA (with a unique combination of information that came from both father and mother), and humans only produce humans, so the unborn baby can’t be anything other than a human! He or she is an individual.”
Quinn’s argument, Ham said, “completely ignores biology, including genetics.”
“It’s merely her attempt to make the evil of abortion – the murder of children – more palatable,” Ham wrote.
Ham noted that the unborn baby has different DNA, distinct fingerprints, its own nervous system and its own heart.
“A baby is not part of a woman’s body,” Ham wrote. “The baby begins life inside the woman’s body, but that is not the same as being part
The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at Christian Headline