MEDIA

    The Bible is UNDER ATTACK: Southern Baptists Remove All Masculine References From Scripture, Even From The Father

    By Nate  Published: June 12, 2017

    The Bible, Christians, and the Church in America and all over the world are all under assault by culture.

    The Southern Baptists have removed all ‘non-inclusive’ gender language from scripture itself in their translation of the Bible; the Christian Standard Bible (CSB).

    The following is according to the Atlantic;

    Southern Baptists have long defended literal approaches to the Bible, but their recent translation of the Good Book might have them switching sides.

    Last fall, the publishing arm of the 15-million member Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) released the Christian Standard Bible (CSB). LifeWay Christian Stores, America’s largest Christian retailer, which is owned by the SBC, sells the translation at hundreds of its locations nationwide and touts it as a work of superior scholarship. But patrons are largely unaware that the denomination-approved translation is gender-inclusive.

    Such news would presumably shock many in the evangelical body. The denomination has affirmed that the Bible commands wives to submit to their husbands and that modern notions of transgender identity blur the line between God-ordained masculine and feminine roles. The group has passed numerous resolutions since the late 1990s publicly condemning Bible translations that attempt to utilize gender-inclusive language.

    When several revisions to the popular New International Version (1984) appeared to employ gender-neutral language, for example, Southern Baptists condemned the translation by name and chastised its publishers. A 2011 resolution even instructed LifeWay to cease selling the translation in its stores. (LifeWay has continued to sell the NIV despite the resolution to remove it; the translation remains the most popular among Southern Baptists with a 40 percent share.)

    The rationale behind the rebuke was two-fold. First, inclusive translations abolish many gender-specific terms. For example, they may change “father” to “parent,” “son” to “child,” and “man” to “mortal.” And second, these translations added words and phrases not found in ancient manuscripts for the sake of inclusion. A common example is the translation of “brother” as “brother or sister.”

    Some scholars defend translation decisions like these, arguing they most clearly express the meaning of each passage. But the SBC disagrees, seeing such translations as part of a larger cultural push to erase distinctions between genders and diminish masculinity. It believes political correctness is threatening the integrity of its holy scripture.

    In response to this perceived menace, the SBC commissioned its own Bible translation, the Holman Christian Standard Bible, which was finalized in 2003. It was intended “to champion the absolute truth of the Bible against social or cultural agendas that would compromise its accuracy.” The translation was well received and the Bible battlefront quieted for more than a decade. But when a revision was released last fall, a number of the same “gender-neutral” elements that the SBC previously condemned were inserted into its own translation.

    The CSB now translates the term anthropos, a Greek word for “man,” in a gender-neutral form 151 times, rendering it “human,” “people,” and “ones.” The previous edition had done this on occasion; the new revision adds almost 100 more instances. “Men of Israel” becomes “fellow Israelites;” when discussing Jesus’s incarnation the “likeness of men” becomes “likeness of humanity.” The CSB translates the term adelphoi, a Greek word for “brother” in a gender-neutral form 106 times, often adding “sister.” “Brotherly love” is translated “love as brothers and sisters.”

    The remainder of this article is available in its entirety at The Atlantic

    Share This Video Get the App
    Google Play Apple Store

    4
    Share Your Thoughts

    avatar
    3 Comment threads
    1 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    4 Comment authors
    Nate BrownMattAnneSherry G Recent comment authors
    Matt
    Matt

    It’s really discouraging to see shoddy reporting by The Atlantic picked up so quickly to wrongly condemn the SBC. Here’s the response to The Atlantic:… Read more »

    Anne
    Anne

    We know from Revelation that the liberal mainstream churches will be sucked into the all-inclusive pseudo-Christian worldwide beast system that is right around the corner…… Read more »

    Sherry G
    Sherry G

    Shock! I know other Protestant denominations have left the truth and brought Islam into their churches but never dreamed the Southern Baptists would retranslate the… Read more »