The United Nations now owns the climate, in a rather sweeping move for control of the weather – the UN successfully adopted the Paris Agreement into its agenda. Citing that Climate Change is the most important issue of our time, environmentalists across the globe have offered solutions that range from cutting emissions to depopulation.

According to Travis N. Rieder, Bioethicist and philosopher at the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University, the people of the world must stop having children – immediately. Although Travis has a child of his own, this individual believes that the government should creep further into our private lives and limit the number of children a family is allowed to produce, similar to China.

The bioethicist calls his ideology “population engineering”; which is the intentional manipulation of the size and structure of human populations. To justify the engineering of the population, Travis cites that Climate Change is a worthy cause. The researcher states that Carbon dioxide doesn’t kill climate, people do. Which is rather interesting given the entire stance of the United Nations agenda for climate change is supposedly only about stopping emissions.

The researcher isn’t the only individual who holds such views; similar views can be found with the likes of Bill Gates, and other elitists and or globalists.

Interestingly enough, the plan to slow the population growth has already begun, Bill Gates stated that the more vaccines provided to the public the more they can slow population growth. (See the second video above)

Using the research provided by Bill Gates, the machines aren’t necessarily the problem – the people are. That means that once the Climate Change Accord otherwise known as the Paris Agreement takes effect on November 4th, 2016 countries around the world can legally begin a depopulation program or agenda.

Fighting Climate change was never about renewable energy and sustainable development, rather it is about population engineering. Allowing a global governance to adopt such dangerous rhetoric, gives rise to agendas such as Communism and National or Democratic Socialism (Nazism). Reason being, it allows for individual “bloodlines” to grow their families while systematically killing everyone else off. Here’s the kicker – they wouldn’t kill the people of the world by war, rather they would just sicken them and then stop them from producing children.

Again, the basis for the origins of such ideology can be traced back to the United Nation’s founding, more specifically the founding of UNESCO – Julian Huxley. Julian was a British evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and internationalist. He was a proponent of natural selection and a leading figure in the mid-twentieth century modern evolutionary synthesis. Julian was the first Director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association. (Learn More about the truth regarding UNESCO Here)

Moreover, a modern day example that the ideology surrounding the UN’s adoption of the Paris Agreement is about control rather than stopping climate change lies within their own words. According to United Nations Climate Chief Christiana Figueres, “democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model.”

The same China who recently announced a “Religious Winter” in a bid to destroy Christianity. The communist party is attempting to silence the voices and movement of Christians throughout China. Any and all unauthorized religious activity will be suppressed, making house churches disband. One of the new rules says it will be an offense to “organize citizens to attend religious training, conferences and activities abroad,” “preaching, organizing religious activities, and establishing religious institutions or religious sites at schools,” and “providing religious services through the internet.”

Giving rise to the rhetoric of communist countries such as China, the UN has successfully adopted one of the most controversial ideologies of our time, geoengineering. In the name of “fighting” climate change, the ideology surrounding solutions range from clean energy all the way to the Rosicrucian agendas such as depopulation. Famously carved into the Georgia Guidestones is a set of principles engraved in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones.

  • Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  • Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
  • Unite humanity with a living new language.
  • Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
  • Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  • Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  • Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  • Balance personal rights with social duties.
  • Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
  • Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

That first line, which the globalists have yet to complete, can now officially begin. Giving a centralized world government the power to control who can and cannot have children allows a dangerous precedent to be set. Not to mention, what would happen to the other people who are not chosen within the 500,000,000 ‘allowed to live individuals.’ The Guidestones, paint a perpetual picture of a world that is not “dealing” with climate change because it is “in balance” with nature, which is exactly what the goal of climate change is, even though the globalists fail to mention they are going to kill to get it.

Population Engineering is just one “small” part of the United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development or in other words the Global Goals for 2030. The UN’s goal is to build a New World Order systematically, and on September 16th, 2016 – they adopted the communist agenda of creating a new global human order; effectively embarking the world on the darkest and most dangerous path in history.

In Conclusion, Travis does not expect the governments to adopt his ideology but rather he hopes to “change people’s assumptions about having kids.” There is just one significant problem with that, though; the bioethicist is teaching the ‘next generation.’ Travis’ ideology lines directly up with the agenda set in place by the world governing body, the United Nations, and painstakingly obvious is their collusion to systematically destroy humanity and control it, or in other words – “engineer the population.”

Updates


Bill Nye the ‘science guy’ just ran a segment with Travis N. Rieder, the Bioethicist mentioned above, and in response to Rieder’s ideology, Bill Nye pondered if people in the ‘developed world’ need to pay a penalty for “having extra kids.”

Unreal right?


End of Updates; last updated on April 27th 2017 at 11:30 EST

Works Cited

Eric Roston. “ Want to Slow Climate Change? Stop Having Babies .” Bloomberg. . (2016): . . http://bloom.bg/2dJd5yH

Jennifer Ludden. “Should We Be Having Kids In The Age Of Climate Change? .” NPR. . (2016): . . http://n.pr/2dZ1vuH

Colin Hickey, Travis Rieder, Jake Earl. “Population Engineering and the Fight against Climate Change.” Academia. . (2016): . . http://bit.ly/2e4suUJ

16
Share Your Thoughts

avatar
6 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
JtSmittyBibleGuyNateBibleGuy Recent comment authors
Jt
Jt

This is not a thought this is reality !! I am going to proof to you in 20 sec the real cause of climate change… Read more »

Smitty
Smitty

This is the same scare tactic used in the 50’s and 60’s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Population_Bomb

We were supposed to starve by 1970,

Mike
Mike

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness… Read more »

Lauren
Lauren

Dear Nate Before last year I didn’t drink pop as much as I do now. Now when I ate out I drink pop instead of… Read more »

Chow ling
Chow ling

This dude is nuts. Why dont we just get rid of all the nuts like him